General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · North Carolina

Styline Logistics North Carolina

High Point, NC · ~49 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Styline Logistics North Carolina runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Styline Logistics North Carolina: 4.3 TCR = 96% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Styline Logistics North Carolina safety composite

Styline Logistics North Carolina scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Styline Logistics North Carolina: 6.8 → 9.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.52× in 2024

Styline Logistics North Carolina's TCR rose 3.0 from 6.8 in 2016 to 9.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 96% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #87/125
  • PHOTO R. F. Chamberland, I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R. F. Chamberland, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Styline Logistics North Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Styline Logistics North Carolina averages 4.3 TCR (96% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Styline Logistics North Carolina TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=9.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Styline Logistics North Carolina falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 125 General freight trucking, long employers in North Carolina.

Styline Logistics North Carolina (49 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Styline Logistics North Carolina
Styline Logistics North Carolina (49 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Styline Logistics North Carolina has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.8 6.5 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2017 8.3 6.7 5 0 0
2016 6.8 4.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · NC · High Point

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R. F. Chamberland, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dedicated Casa Grande 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Church Hill 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brown Trucking Company Richmond, VA 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zackly Rite Farms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor's Nursery-Raleigh 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball Hatchery # 3 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matthews Operations Center 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Teasdale Latin Foods (Greeley, CO) 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chelmsford 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR O.C. Jones & Sons, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ditch Witch Midwest:West Chicago 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE OFS Plant #11 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Material Exchange, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tampa Terminal 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE white springs terminal 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.