Landscape care and maintenance services · Kansas

Suburban Landscape Management

Wichita, KS · ~92 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Suburban Landscape Management runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Suburban Landscape Management: 6.5 TCR = 144% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Suburban Landscape Management safety composite

Suburban Landscape Management scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2016→2023

Suburban Landscape Management injury rate improved

Suburban Landscape Management's TCR fell 8.1 from 9.3 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 76.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=76.3 · 2023=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Wichita, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 144% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #10/20
  • PHOTO North Branch Nursery…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Branch Nursery Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Suburban Landscape Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Suburban Landscape Management averages 6.5 TCR (144% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Suburban Landscape Management TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=76.3 · 2023=1.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Suburban Landscape Management falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 20 Landscape care and maintenance employers in Kansas.

Suburban Landscape Management (92 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Suburban Landscape Management
Suburban Landscape Management (92 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Suburban Landscape Management has more employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 76.3 47.7 6 2 0
2021 6.9 5.1 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.7 4.8 8 0 0
2018 13.8 0.0 4 6 0
2016 9.3 4.7 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · KS · Wichita

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Branch Nursery Inc 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4405_18972 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franz Witte Landscape Contracting, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Opterra Solutions Inc. 08 West Atlanta 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kansas City Treat 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mainline Printing Inc 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubrication Engineers, Inc 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITW Pro Brands 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR Driscoll Construction Co., Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Paris Corporation 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wines Unlimited 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6233 Margate 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Madison #225 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Lebanon #167 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Desert Springs Healthcare & Wellness 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE QSI Live Oak 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.