Physical distribution consulting services · Florida

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806)

Jacksonville, FL · ~122 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) runs at 488% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Physical distribution consulting services workplace, earning a grade F.

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806): 2.4 TCR = 488% of Physical distribution consulting services BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) safety composite

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806): 1.3 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2.6× in 2024

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806)'s TCR rose 5.1 from 1.3 in 2020 to 6.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541614 · Jacksonville, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.4 · 488% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Shell Convent
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shell Convent (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) averages 2.4 TCR (488% of the Physical distribution consulting services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) TCR series: 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) falls in its industry

102 Physical distribution consulti establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Physical distribution consulti employers in Florida.

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) (122 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806)
Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) (122 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (806) has more employees than the Physical distribution consulting service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 6.3 8 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 2.5 1.9 4 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541614 · FL · Jacksonville

102 Physical distribution consulting services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shell Convent 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Materials Management 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ShipBob Grapevine 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FreightWatch International (USA), Inc 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE MCE Miami - Central Service Center 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Pensacola 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Construction - Office 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cutler Bay Rapid Response Team 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR The Lincoln Electric Company - Euclid 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lewisburg East, OH 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Evans Street 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkot's 304 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Corpus Christi 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heather Manor Nursing and Rehab Center 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Baths Manufacturing, LTD. - Chrisman Facility 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE LANSC Lancaster Service Center 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.