Employer · Georgia

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc.

Duluth, GA · ~100 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical industry workplace, earning a grade C.

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc.: 3.8 TCR = 85% of industry BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. safety composite

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2023

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. injury rate improved

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.8 from 7.3 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484210 · Duluth, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #8/20
  • PHOTO Planes Moving & Stor…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Planes Moving & Storage of Indianapolis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. averages 3.8 TCR (85% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=4 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. falls in its industry

548 industry establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 20 industry employers in Georgia.

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. (100 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 7.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc.
Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. (100 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 7.6

Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2022 4.7 4.7 3 0 0
2021 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2019 3.9 3.0 4 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2017 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2016 7.3 7.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484210 · GA · Duluth

548 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 203 employers in Duluth, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Planes Moving & Storage of Indianapolis 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3416 - 1-HICKORY NC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BHAG Houston LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suddath Relocation Systems of Jacksonville, Inc. 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colquitt Electric Membership Corporation - Moultrie 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Providence Group of GA 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Kitchen - Decatur 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Utilities of GA Ince 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Duluth 1,352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boehringer Ingelheim Duluth 1,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR BI Vet Medica 1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR 123569-NORTH METRO GA P&DC 1,103 FTE
NAT-TCR CONSTRUCTION 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5237 Biscayne 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cbigg Management, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Chillicothe Svc Ctr 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Forest Plywood Sales 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Helena Laboratories Corp - Washington Blvd 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRC Global -172 La Porte, TX (RDC) 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2086 Severn Distrib Center (Md) 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.