Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living

Name: Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Anderson, IN · ~49 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 6.8
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living: 6.8 TCR = 179% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living safety composite

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 6.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers
DART rate: D 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living: 0.0 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2021

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living's TCR rose 10.2 from 0.0 in 2019 to 10.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Anderson, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 179% of ind

DART 5.1 DART
RANK #74/133
PHOTO Sierra Regency
BOOK 3y book
INJ 8 inj
SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sierra Regency (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

This site

6.8
Sierra Regency

6.8
Travanse Livin

6.8
Hudson Valley

6.8
Wickshire Port

6.8

What this shows Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living averages 6.8 TCR (179% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=10.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living (49 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sugar Fork Crossing Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2021	10.2	5.1	4
2020	10.2	5.1	4
2019	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Anderson

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 103 employers in Anderson, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Sierra Regency	ROSEVILLE, CA	6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Travanse Living at Grayslake	GRAYSLAKE, IL	6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hudson Valley Home Health Care LLC	MIDDLETOWN, NY	6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Wickshire Port Orange	PORT ORANGE, FL	6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Freeland Dairy	EARL PARK	49 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Hoosier Pride Farms, LLC	BRYANT	49 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Windfall Multi-Crop Research Center	WINDFALL	49 FTE
STATE-SIZE	DuPont Pioneer Rush1	RUSHVILLE	49 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Carter Express Inc	Anderson	1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Community Hospital Anderson	Anderson	1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HARRAH'S HOOSIER PARK RACING & CASINO	Anderson	804 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Nestle USA	Anderson	798 FTE
NAT-TCR	1 Cooper Plaza	Camden, NJ	6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Berkots 311	Orland Park, IL	6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	ORL	Winter Park, FL	6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	All-Star-Burlington	Harwinton, CT	6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Metal Sales MC - Temple	Temple, TX	49 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Community Coffee Company - Baton Rouge Sales	Baton Rouge, LA	49 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Starcon - West	Burlington, WA	49 FTE
NAT-SIZE	2440 Artesia	Fullerton, CA	49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.