Senior citizens' homes without nursing care · Indiana

Sugar Fork Crossing

Anderson, IN · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugar Fork Crossing runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Senior citizens' homes without nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Sugar Fork Crossing: 4.8 TCR = 127% of Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugar Fork Crossing safety composite

Sugar Fork Crossing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sugar Fork Crossing: 0.0 → 9.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Sugar Fork Crossing's TCR rose 9.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 9.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Anderson, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 127% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #51/133
  • PHOTO Brookdale New Hope
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale New Hope (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Sugar Fork Crossing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sugar Fork Crossing averages 4.8 TCR (127% of the Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sugar Fork Crossing TCR series: 2017=0 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Sugar Fork Crossing falls in its industry

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 133 Senior citizens' homes without employers in Indiana.

Sugar Fork Crossing (38 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sugar Fork Crossing
Sugar Fork Crossing (38 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sugar Fork Crossing has fewer employees than the Senior citizens' homes without nursing c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 0.0 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Anderson

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 103 employers in Anderson, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale New Hope 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tyler Memory Care Properties, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suite Living of North St. Paul 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landings of Albemarle 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenleaf Holdco LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Poultry Services, MPS Egg Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yale Corteva 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marion Svc Ctr Bldg 1 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter Express Inc 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital Anderson 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARRAH'S HOOSIER PARK RACING & CASINO 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle USA 798 FTE
NAT-TCR Nhldr - Nelc Pratt Whitney-10364 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 10423 Ideal 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Laughlin Healthcare Center 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Holton Manor 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE D88 Phoenix 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodbrook 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55833 Grayslake 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hop Industries Corporation 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.