Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · Georgia

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems

Fayetteville, GA · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems: 4.8 TCR = 145% of Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems safety composite

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems: 0.0 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2024

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems's TCR rose 6.7 from 0.0 in 2020 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Fayetteville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 145% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #42/61
  • PHOTO SFI of Arkansas
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SFI of Arkansas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems averages 4.8 TCR (145% of the Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=17.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems falls in its industry

1,158 Canopies, sheet metal (except establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 61 Canopies, sheet metal (except employers in Georgia.

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems (21 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems
Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems (21 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Sugar Rock Corporation d/b/a Shade Systems has fewer employees than the Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 6.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 17.2 11.4 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · GA · Fayetteville

1,158 Canopies, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 59 employers in Fayetteville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SFI of Arkansas 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Metals Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kerber Sheet Metal Works, Inc 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snappy ADP NY 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Seven Hills Forestry LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim's Pride Commerce Hatchery 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Gin, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Fayette Hospital 2,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brent Scarbrough & Company 509 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 594 378 FTE
CITY-NEAR 594 359 FTE
NAT-TCR Evolution Construction Services, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4114-Moxy Louisville Dt 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Laguardia Retail Management Corp. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CSTK-Bethlehem 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pelletrox INC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insulation Solutions, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE DipStop, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shop 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.