Concrete finishing · Ohio

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc

Millersburg, OH · ~43 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concrete finishing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc: 1.0 TCR = 35% of Concrete finishing BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc safety composite

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 232.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.54× in 2024

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 232.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Millersburg, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #10/64
  • PHOTO Williams Concrete Co…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Williams Concrete Construction Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc averages 1.0 TCR (35% of the Concrete finishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=232.4 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete finishing establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 64 Concrete finishing employers in Ohio.

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc (43 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc
Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc (43 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Sugarcreek Concrete Finishers Inc has fewer employees than the Concrete finishing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 232.4 154.9 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · OH · Millersburg

1,314 Concrete finishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 61 employers in Millersburg, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Williams Concrete Construction Co., Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRAWCO, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Addessi Brothers Inc. (Office) 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR C&C Footings & Foundations, LLC 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CW Egg Products 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-Marysville 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Clairsville Ohio 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresden Plant 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walnut Creek Foods 370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pomerene Hospital 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centor Berlin Ohio 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1724 246 FTE
NAT-TCR McLiney Lumber & Supply 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DEN1-DWH-DENVER 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New England Orbital Services, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Wireless Services, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Haskins Inc's Establishment 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olive Hill Greenhouses - Green Canyon Road 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manlove Storage Field 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE GP Reeves INC 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.