Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities · Pennsylvania

Sugarcreek Station

Franklin, PA · ~153 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sugarcreek Station runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Sugarcreek Station: 7.3 TCR = 112% of Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sugarcreek Station safety composite

Sugarcreek Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2024

Sugarcreek Station injury rate improved

Sugarcreek Station's TCR fell 4.4 from 12.8 in 2016 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 20.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.8 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=20.4 · 2024=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Franklin, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 7.3 · 112% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #361/754
  • PHOTO Avantara Elgin
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avantara Elgin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sugarcreek Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sugarcreek Station averages 7.3 TCR (112% of the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sugarcreek Station TCR series: 2016=12.8 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=20.4 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Sugarcreek Station falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skille establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #361 safest of 754 Nursing Care Facilities Skille employers in Pennsylvania.

Sugarcreek Station (153 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sugarcreek Station
Sugarcreek Station (153 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Sugarcreek Station has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 0.0 3 0 0
2023 20.4 6.8 6 0 0
2022 3.3 0.0 3 0 0
2021 1.7 0.6 3 0 0
2020 5.3 2.7 6 0 0
2019 2.9 2.3 5 0 0
2018 4.1 4.1 6 0 0
2017 6.8 5.3 9 0 0
2016 12.8 8.3 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Franklin

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 43 employers in Franklin, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avantara Elgin 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LA Old Hammond Hwy, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luther Woods SNF LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avow Hospice 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2490_4560 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Utilities Stone Pointe 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE DVL Group, Inc 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAM Acoustical Corporation 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Visiting Nurses Association 896 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin Plant 2 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell Safety Products - Miller by Honeywell 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Joy Global Underground Plant 2 258 FTE
NAT-TCR Matheny Medical and Educational Center 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Medical Center Kingsley 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Suwannee Valley Feeds, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 33 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Special-Lite Decatur 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE RG Transport 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marmon Utility LLC Milford 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lone Cactus Egg Farm 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.