Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park

Brooklyn Park, MN · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park: 3.2 TCR = 83% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park safety composite

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park: 0.0 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2024

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park's TCR rose 9.5 from 0.0 in 2021 to 9.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Brooklyn Park, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 83% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #34/226
  • PHOTO Legend of McKinney
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Legend of McKinney (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Suite Living of Brooklyn Park averages 3.2 TCR (83% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park TCR series: 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=9.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Suite Living of Brooklyn Park falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park (23 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Suite Living of Brooklyn Park
Suite Living of Brooklyn Park (23 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Suite Living of Brooklyn Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.5 4.8 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Brooklyn Park

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 226 employers in Brooklyn Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Legend of McKinney 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continuing Healthcare Beacon House 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maplewood Nursing Home 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sylacauga Health and Rehab Services 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooten 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Alpha Foods, LLP 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNHT-SEL-HIGHWAY 12' 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fergus Falls CSC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0591 - Target Northern Campus 5,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMRG 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Services 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Egan Company 962 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGA9 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Moss Utilities 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Family Home Health, a division of QLS 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Wvu Sodexo Administration 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hi-Grade Materials - Littlerock Ready Mix 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warren Central Kitchen 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount Pleasant Towne Centre 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lewis Builders, Inc. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.