Commercial building construction · Maryland

Summit Construction (Frederick)

Frederick, MD · ~92 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summit Construction (Frederick) runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Summit Construction (Frederick): 3.1 TCR = 108% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summit Construction (Frederick) safety composite

Summit Construction (Frederick) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Summit Construction (Frederick): 2.9 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

Summit Construction (Frederick)'s TCR rose 0.6 from 2.9 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Frederick, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 108% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #72/99
  • PHOTO McNelly Services, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McNelly Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Summit Construction (Frederick) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summit Construction (Frederick) averages 3.1 TCR (108% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summit Construction (Frederick) TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=5.7 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Summit Construction (Frederick) falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 99 Commercial building constructi employers in Maryland.

Summit Construction (Frederick) (92 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Summit Construction (Frederick)
Summit Construction (Frederick) (92 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Summit Construction (Frederick) has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 3 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2018 5.7 5.7 6 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Frederick

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 267 employers in Frederick, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McNelly Services, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR W and L Group Construction Inc 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DeStefano & Associates, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Maintenance Service Kennesaw 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2019135 - East Campus Bldg 3 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cole Roofing Company, Inc 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Sortation Solutions 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schroeder Industries LLC 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-03 4,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing Center 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 568 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Fed Reserve Bank St.Louis Cafe 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MODESTO 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Montclair 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Suncast Corporation Plant 3 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Creative Packaging 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Oswego 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC SC FeedMill 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott Louisville East 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.