Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction · Texas

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC

Pasadena, TX · ~238 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC safety composite

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2019

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC injury rate improved

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #59/92
  • PHOTO Phillip Morris Richm…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~238 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phillip Morris Richmond (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summit Industrial Construction, LLC averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Summit Industrial Construction, LLC falls in its industry

924 Chemical (except petrochemical establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 92 Chemical (except petrochemical employers in Texas.

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC (238 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Summit Industrial Construction, LLC
Summit Industrial Construction, LLC (238 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Summit Industrial Construction, LLC has more employees than the Chemical (except petrochemical process t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2017 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · TX · Pasadena

924 Chemical (except petrochemical process type) plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phillip Morris Richmond 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1359-Duke Midwest Region 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bartlett Cocke General Contractors (East Texas Region-Industrial Division) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEM Industrial Inc. - Husky Energy, Lima 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JBI Electrical Systems (Fort Worth) 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Worth Plant 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Starplast USA LLC 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR ArcelorMittal Tailored Blanks Pioneer 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ComNet Communications, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Esys Automation 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Joseph Lane Middle School 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marlborough - Simarano Drive 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zimmerbiomet Spine 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Paul TC 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redstone Village 238 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.