Laboratory standards testing instruments (e.g., capacitance, electrical resistance, inductance) manufacturing · Utah

Summit Nutritional Laboratories

Spanish Fork, UT · ~24 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summit Nutritional Laboratories runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Laboratory standards testing instruments (e.g., capacitance, electrical resistance, inductance) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Summit Nutritional Laboratories: 5.7 TCR = 172% of Laboratory standards testing instruments (e.g., capacitance, electrical resistance, inductance) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summit Nutritional Laboratories safety composite

Summit Nutritional Laboratories scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.0

2020→2024

Summit Nutritional Laboratories injury rate improved

Summit Nutritional Laboratories's TCR fell 14.0 from 14.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 366.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=14.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=366.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Spanish Fork, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P4
  • PHOTO Carter Subaru
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carter Subaru (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Summit Nutritional Laboratories in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summit Nutritional Laboratories averages 5.7 TCR (172% of the Laboratory standards testing instruments (e.g., capacitance, electrical resistance, inductance) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summit Nutritional Laboratories TCR series: 2020=14 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=366.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Summit Nutritional Laboratories falls in its industry

125 Laboratory standards testing i establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Summit Nutritional Laboratories (24 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Summit Nutritional Laboratories
Summit Nutritional Laboratories (24 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Summit Nutritional Laboratories has fewer employees than the Laboratory standards testing instruments median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 366.8 122.3 3 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 14.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · UT · Spanish Fork

125 Laboratory standards testing instruments (e.g., capacitance, electrical resistance, inductance) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 49 employers in Spanish Fork, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carter Subaru 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Energy Industries - Lockport 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wenzel Associates Inc 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Itoh Denki USA Inc 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARM 42106 SOW -EST 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perco Rock Company 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00567 PARK CITY SERV CTR 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highmark Construction 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunroc Corporation 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Young Living Essential Oils - DC 1,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR YLEO Distribution Centers 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nature's Sunshine Manufacturing facility 355 FTE
NAT-TCR Function of Beauty 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Samuel Packaging Systems Group-Heath 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 10707 Sunnyvale 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 10510 Melrose 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wellsville SC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paul Crandall & Associates, Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scion Steel - Capitol 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mauston Tool Corporation 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.