Skilled nursing facilities · Maryland

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center

Catonsville, MD · ~111 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center: 5.4 TCR = 84% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center: 6.4 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.69× in 2021

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 2.8 from 6.4 in 2016 to 9.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Catonsville, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.4 · 84% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #65/176
  • PHOTO Winchester Rehabilit…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Winchester Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 5.4 TCR (84% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=9.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 176 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Maryland.

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center (111 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center
Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center (111 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Summit Park Health and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.2 9.2 4 3 0
2020 5.8 4.7 2 3 0
2019 6.7 6.7 6 0 0
2018 4.6 3.5 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.4 5.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MD · Catonsville

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 46 employers in Catonsville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Winchester Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAL COLLIERVILLE LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Field Crest Care Center 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pontotoc Health and Rehab Center 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Empire Landscape, LLC 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanover Maryland 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE MAD Fort Mead 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Island Mechanical, Inc 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charlestown 1,064 FTE
CITY-NEAR DeSoto 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2248 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollander 232 FTE
NAT-TCR ITO - Ground Ops 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Linen King, LLC (Springdale) 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-40411) 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Packaging 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Admirals Pointe 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Carmichael Healthcare Center 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE ELP - Ground Ops 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Refresco 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.