Residential construction, single-family, general contractors · Oregon

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration

Tigard, OR · ~63 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Residential construction, single-family, general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration: 5.6 TCR = 147% of Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration safety composite

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration: 4.0 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2023

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration's TCR rose 3.1 from 4.0 in 2022 to 7.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Tigard, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 147% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #15/25
  • PHOTO Providence Builders
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Providence Builders (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summit Reconstruction & Restoration averages 5.6 TCR (147% of the Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration TCR series: 2022=4 · 2023=7.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Summit Reconstruction & Restoration falls in its industry

976 Residential construction, sing establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 25 Residential construction, sing employers in Oregon.

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration (63 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Summit Reconstruction & Restoration
Summit Reconstruction & Restoration (63 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Summit Reconstruction & Restoration has more employees than the Residential construction, single-family, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.1 2.4 3 0 0
2022 4.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · OR · Tigard

976 Residential construction, single-family, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 142 employers in Tigard, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Providence Builders 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park City Con & Development 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CR Benge Construction Inc 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Todd Construction, Inc. Main Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerick Construction 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Texstar - Aurora 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Reynolds Electric 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue 580 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 560 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCI Portland Interior 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12608 415 FTE
NAT-TCR Foley Company LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilty's Electric-California, INC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bemus Landscape Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Holman Logistics - GE Auburn 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Image Stream Medical, subsidiary of Olympus Corporation 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Engineered Plastic Components 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hansen's IGA Stanley 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.