Citrus grove cultivation services · California

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa

Bakersfield, CA · ~79 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Citrus grove cultivation services workplace, earning a grade D.

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa: 7.3 TCR = 163% of Citrus grove cultivation services BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa safety composite

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2017→2022

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa injury rate improved

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa's TCR fell 0.9 from 6.1 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.1 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=10.0 · 2022=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115112 · Bakersfield, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 163% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #58/86
  • PHOTO Central Counties Coo…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Counties Cooperative (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa averages 7.3 TCR (163% of the Citrus grove cultivation services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa TCR series: 2017=6.1 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=10 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa falls in its industry

221 Citrus grove cultivation servi establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 86 Citrus grove cultivation servi employers in California.

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa (79 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa
Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa (79 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa has more employees than the Citrus grove cultivation services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 5.2 4 0 0
2020 10.0 8.8 8 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 4 0 0
2018 12.2 6.9 15 1 0
2017 6.1 3.0 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115112 · CA · Bakersfield

221 Citrus grove cultivation services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 818 employers in Bakersfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Counties Cooperative 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR C & J Waste Handling, LLC 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAS Royal City 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Basin Farming 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid Valley Nut Company Inc. 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Bakersfield 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-04 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL1 4,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Esparza Enterprises, Inc 3,267 FTE
NAT-TCR 204 Millennium Airport Hotel Buffalo 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02424 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Manheim Denver 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Greif 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atria Glen Ellyn 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Dalton GA 1811 S Hamilton 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE French Trucking Inc 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-Aa-Iad-Washington - Dulles-Iad-Trml 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.