Pipe testing services, oil and gas field, on a contract basis · Louisiana

Sunland Field Services, inc.

Eunice, LA · ~259 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sunland Field Services, inc. runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe testing services, oil and gas field, on a contract basis workplace, earning a grade A.

Sunland Field Services, inc.: 0.5 TCR = 24% of Pipe testing services, oil and gas field, on a contract basis BLS 1.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sunland Field Services, inc. safety composite

Sunland Field Services, inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2019

Sunland Field Services, inc. injury rate improved

Sunland Field Services, inc.'s TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 213112 · Eunice, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/59
  • PHOTO USA Compression Part…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: USA Compression Partners Mid Continent (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Sunland Field Services, inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sunland Field Services, inc. averages 0.5 TCR (24% of the Pipe testing services, oil and gas field, on a contract basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sunland Field Services, inc. TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0 · BLS 1.9

Where Sunland Field Services, inc. falls in its industry

467 Pipe testing services, oil and establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 59 Pipe testing services, oil and employers in Louisiana.

Sunland Field Services, inc. (259 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Sunland Field Services, inc.
Sunland Field Services, inc. (259 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Sunland Field Services, inc. has more employees than the Pipe testing services, oil and gas field median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.3 0.3 2 0 0
2016 0.9 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

213112 · LA · Eunice

467 Pipe testing services, oil and gas field, on a contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 30 employers in Eunice, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR USA Compression Partners Mid Continent 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Pipeline Integrity Center 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elk City 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pro Oil & Gas Services 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE USI Industrial Services 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Port Allen Fab Shop 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trade Construction Company, LLC 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE SODEXO AT TULANE UPTOWN ES 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunland Construction, Inc. 1,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acadian Medical Center 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 773 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR 773 296 FTE
NAT-TCR Titan Directional Drilling 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HydroChem LLC-DPX 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Waterloo Fisher 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Roberts Hawaii Tours Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Batavia -AGCO Parts N.A. 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wellborn Forest Products 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer 258 Richmond KY 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supreme Southeast 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.