Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Iowa

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant

Mt. Pleasant, IA · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant runs at 308% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant: 11.7 TCR = 308% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant safety composite

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant: 0.0 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 23.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant's TCR rose 8.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mt. Pleasant, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 308% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/70
  • PHOTO Pee Dee Gardens
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pee Dee Gardens (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant averages 11.7 TCR (308% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=15.4 · 2018=23.9 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=8.1 · BLS 3.8

Where SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 70 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Iowa.

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant (37 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant
SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant (37 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

SunnyBrook of Mt. Pleasant has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 11.1 3.7 3 0 0
2018 23.9 12.0 6 0 0
2017 15.4 15.4 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IA · Mt. Pleasant

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 7 employers in Mt. Pleasant, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pee Dee Gardens 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurelwood at The Pinehills 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bandon Senior Living 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis Living Mercer Island 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rockwell City Warehouse 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sioux County Egg 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OSI Gen Repair & Svc Wind Plt 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHE - Lawrence (KS009) 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mt. Pleasant 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jabil Packaging Solutions 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden Eagle Dist.- Mt. Pleasant 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Access Energy Cooperative 40 FTE
NAT-TCR Laurelwood at The Pinehills 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1823 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston Methodist Continuing Care Hospital (Katy, TX) 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Preservation Tree Services 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ERMC - Chattanooga 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE VADOC District #43 Probation & Parole 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE ERMC - Hanes Mall 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insteel Wire Products - Hickman, KY 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.