Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers · California

Super Link Plastic, Inc.

Oakland, CA · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Super Link Plastic, Inc. runs at 577% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Super Link Plastic, Inc.: 12.7 TCR = 577% of Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Super Link Plastic, Inc. safety composite

Super Link Plastic, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−27.2

2017→2024

Super Link Plastic, Inc. injury rate improved

Super Link Plastic, Inc.'s TCR fell 27.2 from 27.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 27.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=27.2 · 2018=27.4 · 2019=24.1 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424610 · Oakland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.7 · 577% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO SBC Georgia
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SBC Georgia (2.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Super Link Plastic, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Super Link Plastic, Inc. averages 12.7 TCR (577% of the Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Super Link Plastic, Inc. TCR series: 2017=27.2 · 2018=27.4 · 2019=24.1 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Super Link Plastic, Inc. falls in its industry

101 Foam, plastics, resins and sha establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Foam, plastics, resins and sha employers in California.

Super Link Plastic, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Super Link Plastic, Inc.
Super Link Plastic, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Super Link Plastic, Inc. has fewer employees than the Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merch median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.7 7.7 1 1 0
2022 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.2 8.2 2 0 0
2019 24.1 20.1 6 0 0
2018 27.4 19.6 7 0 0
2017 27.2 21.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424610 · CA · Oakland

101 Foam, plastics, resins and shapes, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 458 employers in Oakland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SBC Georgia 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR E. Plastics - Lancaster 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multi-Plastics, Inc. Santa Fe Springs 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multi-Plastics Inc. - Illinois 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mountain Valley Child and Family Services, Inc. - Gerber 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6957-STS 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glen Park at Ojai 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSY Kleimer Bldg 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakland Unified School District 4,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120301 4,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620301 3,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02620301 2,922 FTE
NAT-TCR Laney's Inc. 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Medford 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy at Cranberry Landing 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoprite of West Deptford 12.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dixie Plywood & Lumber Co. of West Palm Beach 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meriter Newstart 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lancaster Office 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermal Designs and Manufacturing Inc. 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.