Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire · North Carolina

Superior Essex Energy LLC

Tarboro, NC · ~138 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Superior Essex Energy LLC runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade C.

Superior Essex Energy LLC: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Superior Essex Energy LLC safety composite

Superior Essex Energy LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2019

Superior Essex Energy LLC injury rate improved

Superior Essex Energy LLC's TCR fell 3.2 from 5.8 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · Tarboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #13/18
  • PHOTO AmerCable Incorporated
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AmerCable Incorporated (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Superior Essex Energy LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Superior Essex Energy LLC averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Superior Essex Energy LLC TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Superior Essex Energy LLC falls in its industry

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 18 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, employers in North Carolina.

Superior Essex Energy LLC (138 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Superior Essex Energy LLC
Superior Essex Energy LLC (138 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Superior Essex Energy LLC has more employees than the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.6 1.6 5 0 0
2018 2.7 2.0 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.8 1.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · NC · Tarboro

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 46 employers in Tarboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AmerCable Incorporated 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cerrowire, Main 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marmon Utility LLC Milford 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Cable America-NH 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE WF Partnership 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4201 Auburn Church Rd 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE LEM Rural Hall 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heavy Grade 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR ECU Health Edgecombe Hospital 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vidant Edgecombe Hospital 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keihin Carolina System Technology 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hitachi Astemo Greenfield LLC 348 FTE
NAT-TCR Triangle Services - Tampa (TPA) Aviation Svcs 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sauget Facility 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Burrows - Mt Vernon 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lifetouch National School Studios - Chesapeake Plant 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Doubletree by Hilton Cleveland Downtown Lakeside 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tremont MA SNF LLC 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10 - Fort Worth Plant 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rcw K-12 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.