Belt conveyor systems manufacturing · Minnesota

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division

Morris, MN · ~183 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Belt conveyor systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division safety composite

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division: 5.4 → 9.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.82× in 2022

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division's TCR rose 4.5 from 5.4 in 2017 to 9.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Morris, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Santa Rosa Systems
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Santa Rosa Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division TCR series: 2017=5.4 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=9.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division falls in its industry

361 Belt conveyor systems manufact establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Belt conveyor systems manufact employers in Minnesota.

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division (183 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division
Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division (183 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Superior Industries, Inc. - 102 Division has more employees than the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.8 8.9 10 1 0
2021 5.7 4.1 11 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 4 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2018 5.4 4.8 8 0 0
2017 5.4 2.9 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · MN · Morris

361 Belt conveyor systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 38 employers in Morris, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Santa Rosa Systems 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reacher Mfg. Corp. 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PDP LLC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ambaflex Manufacturing Inc. 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AP Midwest, LLC 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Rochester, Inc. 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aquarius Water Conditioning, Inc 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Morris 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmor Industries 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Services 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morris Area Schools ISD #2769 223 FTE
NAT-TCR Vagabond Inn Executive-San Francisco Airport Bayfront (SFO) 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MLR ALF Opco, LLC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chattanooga - 10 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Your Building Centers Inc. Williamsport, PA 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE USM Store #516 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4765-LAXCX00QF 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seedorff Masonry, Inc. 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARC Technologies 183 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.