Central heating equipment and piping installation · California

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc.

Livermore, CA · ~19 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Central heating equipment and piping installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 68% of Central heating equipment and piping installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. safety composite

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #155/594
  • PHOTO BIRMINGHAM
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BIRMINGHAM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (68% of the Central heating equipment and piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Central heating equipment and establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 594 Central heating equipment and employers in California.

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. (19 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Superior Mechanical Services, Inc.
Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. (19 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Superior Mechanical Services, Inc. has fewer employees than the Central heating equipment and piping ins median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.2 6.2 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Livermore

5,793 Central heating equipment and piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BIRMINGHAM 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Tech Systems, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Dane 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upchurch Industrial, LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Burbank - Police - Animal Shelter 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1312 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Companion Animal Clinic 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cost Plus World Market SIMI VALLEY 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Market Basket #20 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Birmingham-Toledo, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomeroy Svc Bldg 1.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.