Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Tennessee

Superior Metal Products, Inc.

Chuckey, TN · ~65 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Superior Metal Products, Inc. runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Superior Metal Products, Inc.: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Superior Metal Products, Inc. safety composite

Superior Metal Products, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2024

Superior Metal Products, Inc. injury rate improved

Superior Metal Products, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.0 from 5.5 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Chuckey, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Industrial Products
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Industrial Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Superior Metal Products, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Superior Metal Products, Inc. averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Superior Metal Products, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Superior Metal Products, Inc. falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Tennessee.

Superior Metal Products, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Superior Metal Products, Inc.
Superior Metal Products, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Superior Metal Products, Inc. has more employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.3 1 1 0
2023 5.3 5.3 4 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.6 3.1 3 0 0
2020 3.5 1.8 2 0 0
2019 7.6 4.6 5 0 0
2018 6.5 1.6 4 0 0
2017 7.4 1.8 4 0 0
2016 5.5 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · TN · Chuckey

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 4 employers in Chuckey, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Industrial Products 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSW, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR R&D Custom Machine and Tool, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intra Technical Services 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schaffhouser Electric Company, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCoy's Heating & Air, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlie Irwin Painting, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rich Products Gallatin 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Durham Hensley Health and Rehabilitation 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR 471632-CHUCKEY PO 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR A & E Machinng and Fabrication, Inc. 18 FTE
NAT-TCR LaSalle Bristol FL 3701 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Alaska 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Humphrey Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Elizabeth City 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA TX Arlington Plant 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rowe Construction 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Manor Care & Rehab Center 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0505 Arlington 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.