Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Montana

Support and Techniques for Empowering People

Billings, MT · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Support and Techniques for Empowering People runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade C.

Support and Techniques for Empowering People: 3.1 TCR = 82% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Support and Techniques for Empowering People safety composite

Support and Techniques for Empowering People scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Support and Techniques for Empowering People: 0.0 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Support and Techniques for Empowering People's TCR rose 6.2 from 0.0 in 2021 to 6.2 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Billings, MT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/26
  • PHOTO HIT Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HIT Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Support and Techniques for Empowering People in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Support and Techniques for Empowering People averages 3.1 TCR (82% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Support and Techniques for Empowering People TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=6.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Support and Techniques for Empowering People falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 26 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Montana.

Support and Techniques for Empowering People (24 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Support and Techniques for Empowering People
Support and Techniques for Empowering People (24 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Support and Techniques for Empowering People has fewer employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MT · Billings

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 327 employers in Billings, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HIT Inc 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR H401-AHV-COMHAB/HR RESHV/SEMP/Admin Bldg/Res Admin 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEFIANCE FACILITY 1 DEFIANCE FACILITY 1 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tall Pines 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Garden City Harvest 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE GNW INC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Energy West Montana-Main Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hardy Construction Co. 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Hospital 2,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Vincent Healthcare 1,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Downtown Campus 1,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Lutheran Ministries 651 FTE
NAT-TCR Systems Operations 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Cutter # 4 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pipestone System Mgmt 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 127 - Decatur-IL 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maselter Cabinets Creative Cabinets, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perfection Finishers 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE 113 Aluminum and Stainless Lafayette 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Three Rivers Solid Waste Autho 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.