Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices · California

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300)

Sacramento, CA · ~151 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) runs at 360% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300): 2.5 TCR = 360% of Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) safety composite

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) held a steady TCR band

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300)'s TCR held near 0.1 from 2.6 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.6 · 2018=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 360% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #147/183
  • PHOTO Lyncag MO
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lyncag MO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) averages 2.5 TCR (360% of the Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.5 · BLS 0.7

Where Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) falls in its industry

1,475 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Reg establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #147 safest of 183 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Reg employers in California.

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) (151 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300)
Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) (151 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Sutter Health Support Services (470-5300) has fewer employees than the Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Mana median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.5 0.0 1 2 0
2017 2.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · CA · Sacramento

1,475 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lyncag MO 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAGNOLIA 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lithia Chevrolet of Redding 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Health Support Services (470-8882) 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delta Farm Packing 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Truitt Oilfield Maintenance Corp. 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chino Base - Bld: 0842 - 15 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lodi Pump and Irrigation, LLC 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Scioto Downs 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Weaver Manufacturing, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #175 (Lincoln, NE (SouthEast)) 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR KPS Global Tennessee 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Health 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Camellia Gardens 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesis Medical Center Aledo Campus 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE PPR 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.