Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) · California

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277)

Roseville, CA · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) workplace, earning a grade B.

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277): 2.8 TCR = 74% of Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) safety composite

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) held a steady TCR band

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 14.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=14.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #111/387
  • PHOTO Lahey Health Primary…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lahey Health Primary Care Ipswich (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) averages 2.8 TCR (74% of the Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=14.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) falls in its industry

2,836 Offices of Physicians (except establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 387 Offices of Physicians (except employers in California.

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) (22 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277)
Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) (22 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Sutter Medical Foundation (185-277) has fewer employees than the Offices of Physicians (except Mental Hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 14.1 7.0 0 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · CA · Roseville

2,836 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lahey Health Primary Care Ipswich 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMG Altavista Medical Center 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30237) 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CentraCare Clinic Albany 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Magna Mirrors- Grand Haven 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Transport Corporation - Tampa 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Madden Bolt 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR James R. Poshard & Son, Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Winter Garden Coop Gin 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Proximity Malt - DE 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE DairyChem Laboratories - Fishers 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPRINGFIELD INC at Chicago Street 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.