Transportation Air Carriers · California

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw

Los Angeles, CA · ~277 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Transportation Air Carriers workplace, earning a grade A.

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw: 0.9 TCR = 21% of Transportation Air Carriers BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw safety composite

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2023→2024

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw injury rate improved

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.5 in 2023 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=1.5 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #7/177
  • PHOTO 2073-SW-20730235-CS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~277 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2073-SW-20730235-CS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw averages 0.9 TCR (21% of the Transportation Air Carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw TCR series: 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw falls in its industry

1,568 Transportation Air Carriers establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 177 Transportation Air Carriers employers in California.

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw (277 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw
Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw (277 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Sw-20730045-Fo Lax - Los Angeles, Ca - Sw has more employees than the Transportation Air Carriers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · CA · Los Angeles

1,568 Transportation Air Carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730235-CS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730012-CS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-DFW-DALLAS FORT WORTH-EAGLE FLIGHT OPS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-EJ-20730219-FO 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE GAR BENNETT LLC 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE BYRD HARVEST INC 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAVID GONZALEZ 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&C Harvesting, Inc. 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Donald Smith Company, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PVE C3 - Product Validation Engineering 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lpr Construction 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Potters Industries LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE CompX National 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nylic - Queens North 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE NADAP, Inc 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE Langer Transport Corp 277 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.