Prefabricated industrial building (except warehouses) erection · Virginia

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc.

Chester, VA · ~105 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Prefabricated industrial building (except warehouses) erection workplace, earning a grade B.

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 77% of Prefabricated industrial building (except warehouses) erection BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. safety composite

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc.: 0.9 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2017

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc.'s TCR rose 2.6 from 0.9 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Chester, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #21/22
  • PHOTO Craftcorps, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Craftcorps, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (77% of the Prefabricated industrial building (except warehouses) erection BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=3.5 · BLS 2.9

Where S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. falls in its industry

924 Prefabricated industrial build establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 22 Prefabricated industrial build employers in Virginia.

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. (105 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc.
S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. (105 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. has more employees than the Prefabricated industrial building (excep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · VA · Chester

924 Prefabricated industrial building (except warehouses) erection employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 119 employers in Chester, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Craftcorps, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCI/Shires, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farr Construction Corporation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rudolph and Sletten Washington Hospital #10343800 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Branch Builds, Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2900 BCD 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electrical Service 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE UnaDyn 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : RIC2 3,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RIC2 2,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR C.W. Wright Construction Company, LLC 697 FTE
CITY-NEAR CW Wright Construction 573 FTE
NAT-TCR 0083 - Beaumont, Tx 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 44531g - King'S Mountain Pec 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen MNF2 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Norcraft - Cottonwood 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100537 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doyles Wholesale 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirlin Builders 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Bay Center 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.