Building cleaning services, janitorial · Texas

Sweep Across Texas

Austin, TX · ~62 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sweep Across Texas runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade C.

Sweep Across Texas: 3.7 TCR = 82% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sweep Across Texas safety composite

Sweep Across Texas scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2024

Sweep Across Texas injury rate improved

Sweep Across Texas's TCR fell 5.8 from 7.3 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #259/417
  • PHOTO Upper Valley Medical…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Upper Valley Medical Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sweep Across Texas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sweep Across Texas averages 3.7 TCR (82% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sweep Across Texas TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Sweep Across Texas falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #259 safest of 417 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Texas.

Sweep Across Texas (62 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sweep Across Texas
Sweep Across Texas (62 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sweep Across Texas has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 7.1 5.7 4 1 0
2018 8.6 8.6 6 0 0
2017 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 7.3 1.4 2 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Austin

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Upper Valley Medical Center 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Norman Medical Center - EVS 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Regional Medical Center - EVS 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kleenmark 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE EP Energy - Eagle Ford (Dilley) 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Dog Drilling 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koserca Headquearters 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monahans 2790 South Wilma, Monahans, TX 79756 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Paragon Casket Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Upper Valley Medical Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lowes Foods #207 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LALA Branded Products 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gregstrom Corporatiion 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keefe Packaging 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wrico Stamping of Arizona 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCCo-IND 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.