Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables · California

Sweetwood Farm, Inc.

Fresno, CA · ~93 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sweetwood Farm, Inc. runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables workplace, earning a grade C.

Sweetwood Farm, Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 91% of Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sweetwood Farm, Inc. safety composite

Sweetwood Farm, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sweetwood Farm, Inc.: 3.3 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.49× in 2024

Sweetwood Farm, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.7 from 3.3 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Fresno, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 91% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #88/236
  • PHOTO Pearl Crop, Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pearl Crop, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sweetwood Farm, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sweetwood Farm, Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (91% of the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sweetwood Farm, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=2 · 2024=6 · BLS 4.5

Where Sweetwood Farm, Inc. falls in its industry

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 236 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an employers in California.

Sweetwood Farm, Inc. (93 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sweetwood Farm, Inc.
Sweetwood Farm, Inc. (93 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sweetwood Farm, Inc. has more employees than the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 2.0 6 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2022 3.5 1.2 3 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2020 3.4 3.4 3 0 0
2019 3.6 0.0 3 0 0
2018 8.6 2.1 8 0 0
2017 3.3 2.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Fresno

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pearl Crop, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAMIESON PRODUCE INC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Odell Plant - Packing Fruit 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Agri Systems - Upper Sandusky 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. View Farming, Inc. 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE PAC-MAN 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE E A & T 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mountain Meadow Mushroom Farms, Inc. 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR 8466 Syosset 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1937 Schererville 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Axiom Roofing Oregon LLC 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Department of Public Safety 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Scotia Village 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newellroadbuilders, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand of Prospect OPCO, LLC 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6210 W Hartford 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.