Distribution of natural gas · Arizona

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29

Tucson, AZ · ~304 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade F.

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29: 2.9 TCR = 240% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 safety composite

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2021

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 injury rate improved

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.1 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 240% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #9/19
  • PHOTO Eversource - Marshfi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~304 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eversource - Marshfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 averages 2.9 TCR (240% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=5 · 2018=2 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=2.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 19 Distribution of natural gas employers in Arizona.

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 (304 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29
Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 (304 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 has more employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.1 1.1 6 0 0
2020 0.7 0.0 2 0 0
2019 4.3 3.7 13 0 0
2018 2.0 1.3 6 0 0
2017 5.0 3.0 15 0 0
2016 3.1 2.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · AZ · Tucson

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Marshfield 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWG CARSON DIST OPS CNTR 0024-FAC10 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CenterPoint Energy Arkla - Pine Bluff Warehouse 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CRENSHAW BASE - 15 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 5329 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elden View 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAZ-Gas Road Office/Operations 0036-FAC29 305 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clayton Homes-951 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Swg Carson Dist Ops Cntr 0024-Fac10 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Michaels (WC USX MFL) 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodland Elementary 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Warehouse 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenville (PC) 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE EBAD-SY 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4637 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Hospital 304 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.