Distribution of natural gas · Arizona

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41

Yuma, AZ · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 runs at 248% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade F.

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41: 3.0 TCR = 248% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 safety composite

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2021

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Yuma, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 248% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO 4730 CANYON DR AMARI…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4730 CANYON DR AMARILLO TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 averages 3.0 TCR (248% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Distribution of natural gas employers in Arizona.

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 (28 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41
Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 (28 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 has fewer employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2018 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · AZ · Yuma

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4730 CANYON DR AMARILLO TX 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR STA BARBARA BASE - 15 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR QUEENS SERVICE CENTER-NY71 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blythe Base - Bld: 0262 - 15 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABACA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tatum 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tonopah 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR Metal Sales MC - Denver 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ajax Tocco Madison Heights 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR King Asphalt, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shenandoah Main Production and Office Facility 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Gainesville 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schaffer Grinding Co. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spancrete - Sebring 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Volkswagen of Duluth 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.