Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Virginia

Swift Creek Forest Products

Jetersville, VA · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swift Creek Forest Products runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Swift Creek Forest Products: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swift Creek Forest Products safety composite

Swift Creek Forest Products scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Swift Creek Forest Products injury rate improved

Swift Creek Forest Products's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Jetersville, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/15
  • PHOTO US Corrugated Santa …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US Corrugated Santa Fe Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Swift Creek Forest Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swift Creek Forest Products averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swift Creek Forest Products TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Swift Creek Forest Products falls in its industry

952 Pallets, wood or wood and meta establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 15 Pallets, wood or wood and meta employers in Virginia.

Swift Creek Forest Products (43 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Swift Creek Forest Products
Swift Creek Forest Products (43 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Swift Creek Forest Products has fewer employees than the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combinat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2021 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.4 2.1 1 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · VA · Jetersville

952 Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 5 employers in Jetersville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US Corrugated Santa Fe Springs 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recycled Jackson (UT1H) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Forest Products - Salisbury, LLC. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pallet Factory 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tahoe Hydro 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Elkwood 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prospect Solar LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water and Sewer 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glenwood Foods, LLC 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR S02898 - Amelia Landfill 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Richmond Hatchery 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Richmond Growout 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Environamics-Raleigh 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR warehouse 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR River City Mechanical 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GSE Dynamics, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Argenio Brothers office 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 065/Buckhead Triangle 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marian Fort Worth 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building 6 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.