Roofing contractors · Kentucky

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc

Elizabethtown, KY · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc runs at 290% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc: 8.1 TCR = 290% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc safety composite

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc injury rate improved

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.1 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=10.0 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=12.6 · 2021=17.3 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Elizabethtown, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 290% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/26
  • PHOTO NV Roofing
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NV Roofing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc averages 8.1 TCR (290% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=10 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=12.6 · 2021=17.3 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 26 Roofing contractors employers in Kentucky.

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc (43 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc
Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc (43 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Swift Roofing of E'town, Inc has fewer employees than the Roofing contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 11.7 2.9 4 0 0
2021 17.3 14.4 6 0 0
2020 12.6 5.0 4 1 0
2019 7.2 4.8 3 0 0
2018 10.0 10.0 4 0 0
2017 6.2 3.1 2 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · KY · Elizabethtown

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 130 employers in Elizabethtown, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NV Roofing 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAX J CC INC dba AMS CONSTRUCTION 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickman Metal Roofing 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Service Works Commercial Roofing, Inc. 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cedar Creek WQTP 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hinkle Environmental Services, LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE D & M Electric Inc 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Kentucky 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hardin Memorial Hospital 2,311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Hardin 2,058 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metalsa 1,807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Etown 956 FTE
NAT-TCR Gourmet Imports 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Treasure Valley Family YMCA 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Miller's Merry Manor 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-CA-Vista-Oak Ridge Way 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ingram Readymix, Inc.-Beaumont Hwy #34 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE The House on the Rock Resort 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect Heights Fire District 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darling Ingredients Inc 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.