Help supply services · Texas

Swift technical Services LLC

Houston, TX · ~3,161 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swift technical Services LLC runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Help supply services workplace, earning a grade A.

Swift technical Services LLC: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Help supply services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swift technical Services LLC safety composite

Swift technical Services LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Swift technical Services LLC held a steady TCR band

Swift technical Services LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561320 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/42
  • PHOTO Dublin Office (3535)
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~3,161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dublin Office (3535) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Swift technical Services LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swift technical Services LLC averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Help supply services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swift technical Services LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Swift technical Services LLC falls in its industry

652 Help supply services establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 42 Help supply services employers in Texas.

Swift technical Services LLC (3,161 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Swift technical Services LLC
Swift technical Services LLC (3,161 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Swift technical Services LLC has more employees than the Help supply services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.6 1.5 2 13 0
2020 0.3 0.3 3 0 0
2019 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2018 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2017 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561320 · TX · Houston

652 Help supply services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dublin Office (3535) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Field Office 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tradesmen International Greensboro 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Judge Wayne 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE A01 Covenant Medical Center 3,178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medical City Dallas Hospital 3,143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Methodist Specialty Physician Group 3,182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiewit Offshore Services, Ltd. 3,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR SME Steel Corporate Office Utah 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Agate Steel Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Premier Equipment Corporation 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mattel Sales Corp 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concord Hospital 3,160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willis-Knighton Medical Center 3,163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.