Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Texas

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Tulia, TX · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 97% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. safety composite

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc.: 2.7 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.6 from 2.7 in 2019 to 5.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Tulia, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #106/161
  • PHOTO Oregon Aerial Constr…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oregon Aerial Construction LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (97% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. TCR series: 2019=2.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=5.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 161 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Texas.

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Swisher Electric Cooperative, Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TX · Tulia

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 14 employers in Tulia, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oregon Aerial Construction LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Power & Lighting, LLC - 230 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AR 1a 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANRAL - Raleigh- NC 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Descanso Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dumas 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy - Wink TX 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE FAR SOUTH MINING LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swisher Memorial Healthcare System 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roll-A-Cone Mfg & Dist Co LTD 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wrangler Feedyard 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR WRANGLER FEED YARD 44 FTE
NAT-TCR Thunder Valley Casino Resort 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rutland Lumber Yard 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GSTC Logistics Muscatine Warehouse 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GEA Farm Technologies 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Allis NPHS 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vintage Knolls 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pennsylvania Rail Car Co. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darling Ingredients Inc 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.