Generating apparatus and parts, welding, electrical, manufacturing · Indiana

System Technologies, Inc.

Indianapolis, IN · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

System Technologies, Inc. runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Generating apparatus and parts, welding, electrical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

System Technologies, Inc.: 4.6 TCR = 141% of Generating apparatus and parts, welding, electrical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

System Technologies, Inc. safety composite

System Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.0

2019→2024

System Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

System Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 13.0 from 13.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=13.0 · 2020=10.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333992 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 141% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Pro Spot International
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pro Spot International (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

System Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows System Technologies, Inc. averages 4.6 TCR (141% of the Generating apparatus and parts, welding, electrical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

System Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2019=13 · 2020=10.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where System Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

129 Generating apparatus and parts establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Generating apparatus and parts employers in Indiana.

System Technologies, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate System Technologies, Inc.
System Technologies, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8

System Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Generating apparatus and parts, welding, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.9 10.9 2 1 0
2019 13.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333992 · IN · Indianapolis

129 Generating apparatus and parts, welding, electrical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pro Spot International 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR polymet Corporation 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Machine Company, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milco Manufacturing Company 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilson Fertilizer, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MISHAWAKA CONCRETE ASPHALT RECYCLE INC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCAR 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connersville District Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Twin Med LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora IL FXFE-AUR 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR VNA of the Treasure Coast 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Freehold Cartage Inc., Solid Waste 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE AmeriChem Systems Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rollstock 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philomath 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE A-TEC - Addison 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.