Fabricated structural metal manufacturing · Arkansas

Systems Fab & Machine Inc

El Dorado, AR · ~72 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Systems Fab & Machine Inc runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fabricated structural metal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Systems Fab & Machine Inc: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Systems Fab & Machine Inc safety composite

Systems Fab & Machine Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Systems Fab & Machine Inc: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.42× in 2024

Systems Fab & Machine Inc's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · El Dorado, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO CSI Industries
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CSI Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Systems Fab & Machine Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Systems Fab & Machine Inc averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Systems Fab & Machine Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Systems Fab & Machine Inc falls in its industry

1,491 Fabricated structural metal ma establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Fabricated structural metal ma employers in Arkansas.

Systems Fab & Machine Inc (72 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Systems Fab & Machine Inc
Systems Fab & Machine Inc (72 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Systems Fab & Machine Inc has more employees than the Fabricated structural metal manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2023 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2022 5.8 1.9 6 0 0
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · AR · El Dorado

1,491 Fabricated structural metal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 102 employers in El Dorado, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CSI Industries 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harris Rebar South Pacific Inc. - Hawaii 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fehrs Industrial Manufacturing 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signal Metal Industries - Irving, TX 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7102205 CMS Newport 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Core Insulation 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windmill Rice Company 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anthony Timberlands, Inc. Beirne 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Murphy Oil USA, Inc 577 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clean Harbors El Dorado LLC 69EL 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clean Harbors Environmental Services El Dorado 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clean Harbors El Dorado 406 FTE
NAT-TCR Linde - Research Triangle Park (Electronics) 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR US Ecology Nevada 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR R. J. Corman Material Sales Company, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SUSSC Susquehanna Service Center 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lounsbury Excavating Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Littrell Lumber Mill, Inc 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-County Electric Company, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scot Industries - Centralia 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.