Mechanical contractors · Arkansas

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25

Osceola, AR · ~67 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Mechanical contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25: 1.1 TCR = 38% of Mechanical contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 safety composite

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2020→2024

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 injury rate improved

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25's TCR fell 2.2 from 3.0 in 2020 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Osceola, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #12/55
  • PHOTO Fort Lauderdale
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fort Lauderdale (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 averages 1.1 TCR (38% of the Mechanical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 TCR series: 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 falls in its industry

5,793 Mechanical contractors establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 55 Mechanical contractors employers in Arkansas.

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 (67 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25
Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 (67 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Systems Plant Services, Inc.-ARK25 has more employees than the Mechanical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · AR · Osceola

5,793 Mechanical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 27 employers in Osceola, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fort Lauderdale 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Humphrey Company, Ltd. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mechanical Services, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fettes, Love & Sieben 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Searcy 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Petit Jean Electric Cooperative 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little Rock Lyons AK7M 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE RusCorr II, LLC 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Greetings Corporation 977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big River Steel LLC 679 FTE
CITY-NEAR DENSO Manufacturing Arkansas 573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viskase Companies Osceola Arkansas Plant 220 FTE
NAT-TCR North America Flooring Sales (USA WFH) 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pineville NC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at United Club Rdu Per Pax 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Entegris, Riegelwood 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Imperial CA 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vista Life Innovations - Westbrook Campus 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaffney - 813 Hamrick Street 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Fruit Growers 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.