General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) · California

T & P Farms, LP

Arbuckle, CA · ~264 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

T & P Farms, LP runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) workplace, earning a grade D.

T & P Farms, LP: 7.8 TCR = 174% of General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

T & P Farms, LP safety composite

T & P Farms, LP scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.8

2017→2024

T & P Farms, LP injury rate improved

T & P Farms, LP's TCR fell 11.8 from 11.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.8 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=6.0 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111998 · Arbuckle, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 174% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/21
  • PHOTO COLEMAN AGRICULTURAL…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 220 inj
  • SIZE ~264 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: COLEMAN AGRICULTURAL SERVICES INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

T & P Farms, LP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows T & P Farms, LP averages 7.8 TCR (174% of the General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

T & P Farms, LP TCR series: 2017=11.8 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=6 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=7 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where T & P Farms, LP falls in its industry

128 General combination crop farmi establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 21 General combination crop farmi employers in California.

T & P Farms, LP (264 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate T & P Farms, LP
T & P Farms, LP (264 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 5.2

T & P Farms, LP has more employees than the General combination crop farming (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 36 5 0
2023 7.0 7.0 28 1 0
2022 8.3 8.3 29 1 0
2020 6.0 4.7 19 3 0
2019 10.7 7.8 37 4 0
2018 10.9 6.0 32 6 0
2017 11.8 8.9 39 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111998 · CA · Arbuckle

128 General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 20 employers in Arbuckle, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR COLEMAN AGRICULTURAL SERVICES INC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pagels Ponderosa Cropping LLC 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creekside Valley Farms LLC 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Coast Tomato Growers, Inc. 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE I.S.A. CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE METRO CONSTRUCT/FIELD SERV - 1 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE SonRay Construction 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE HHS Construction, LLC 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alsco Geyer Irrigation, Inc. 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arbuckle Rice Mill 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Valley Rice, LLC 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Valley LLC 110 FTE
NAT-TCR Hillsborough Township Police Department 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hendry Regional Medical Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Utah Pacific bridge & Steel LTD 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Macon Office 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE the urban electric 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Billerica 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soho House Chicago,LLC 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Golden Valley 264 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.