Agriculture production or harvesting crews · Wisconsin

T & T Quality Cutting LLC

Spencer, WI · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

T & T Quality Cutting LLC runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade D.

T & T Quality Cutting LLC: 7.1 TCR = 158% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

T & T Quality Cutting LLC safety composite

T & T Quality Cutting LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

T & T Quality Cutting LLC: 4.7 → 9.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2024

T & T Quality Cutting LLC's TCR rose 5.0 from 4.7 in 2019 to 9.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Spencer, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 158% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Butte Basin Manageme…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Butte Basin Management Company, Sutter Buttes Nursery, Ameriag, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

T & T Quality Cutting LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows T & T Quality Cutting LLC averages 7.1 TCR (158% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

T & T Quality Cutting LLC TCR series: 2019=4.7 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=5 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 4.5

Where T & T Quality Cutting LLC falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Agriculture production or harv employers in Wisconsin.

T & T Quality Cutting LLC (36 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate T & T Quality Cutting LLC
T & T Quality Cutting LLC (36 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

T & T Quality Cutting LLC has fewer employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 4.8 4 0 0
2023 10.3 7.8 4 0 0
2022 5.0 0.0 2 0 0
2021 8.3 8.3 4 0 0
2020 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · WI · Spencer

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 8 employers in Spencer, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Butte Basin Management Company, Sutter Buttes Nursery, Ameriag, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR J & R Farm Labor, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RC FARMS-SALINAS VALLEY 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR H.G CONTRACTING 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rolling Hills Diary Farm, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Electric Cooperative 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kaerek Homes, Inc. 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land O Lakes Spencer 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land O' lakes - Spencer 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR RAMROD INDUSTRIES LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gordy's Spencer Foods, Inc 37 FTE
NAT-TCR Fabrication 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CL Industries 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dragon Star Supermarket 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brilex Industries, Inc P2 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHWD 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Safety Systems 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE The McIntyre Company 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE LT ELectric and Lighting Inc - DBA LT Generators 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.