Appliances, surgical, merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing

Minneapolis, MN · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Appliances, surgical, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing: 0.7 TCR = 33% of Appliances, surgical, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing safety composite

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2023 to 1.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423450 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 33% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #8/21
  • PHOTO 182 - PHOENIX FAS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 182 - PHOENIX FAS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing averages 0.7 TCR (33% of the Appliances, surgical, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.2

Where Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing falls in its industry

754 Appliances, surgical, merchant establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 21 Appliances, surgical, merchant employers in Minnesota.

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing (79 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing
Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing (79 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Tactile Systems Technology Inc Manufacturing has more employees than the Appliances, surgical, merchant wholesale median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423450 · MN · Minneapolis

754 Appliances, surgical, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 182 - PHOENIX FAS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 325 - TROY MI FAS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stryker JR- Metairie, LA 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elcor Construction 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALLSTATES PAVEMENT RECYCLING & STABILIZATION, INC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sir Lines A-Lot 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE USI (Hastings, MN) 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Tradepoint Atlantic, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AG Manufacturing Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PCT Ebeam and Integration 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogers Group Inc. - ETN 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE FCM-FOAM-MITCHELL 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE JMS Crane & Rigging, LLC. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Binderholz Enfield LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ebenezer Railcar Services, Inc. 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.