Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · California

Takehara Landscape, Inc.

Sacramento, CA · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Takehara Landscape, Inc. runs at 347% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

Takehara Landscape, Inc.: 10.1 TCR = 347% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Takehara Landscape, Inc. safety composite

Takehara Landscape, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2017→2019

Takehara Landscape, Inc. injury rate improved

Takehara Landscape, Inc.'s TCR fell 9.7 from 14.9 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.9 · 2019=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 347% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #448/486
  • PHOTO Wirth & Fedewa Const…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wirth & Fedewa Construction Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Takehara Landscape, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Takehara Landscape, Inc. averages 10.1 TCR (347% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Takehara Landscape, Inc. TCR series: 2017=14.9 · 2019=5.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Takehara Landscape, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #448 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

Takehara Landscape, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Takehara Landscape, Inc.
Takehara Landscape, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Takehara Landscape, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2017 14.9 8.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Sacramento

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wirth & Fedewa Construction Inc 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jordan-Wilcomb Construction 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferguson Construction Company - Indiana 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4829-14251 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Sandra Garcia Farming Partnership 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARVIN ADMINISTRATION 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald W Beeman 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE KG Vineyard Management, LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Fairfield Inn & Suites 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hope Healthcare Center 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Manor Care Health Services - Kingston 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stuart (Flstu) 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE RDF&P 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gardenview Assisted Living and Memory Care 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Junction Pipe & Precast 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Inn Collinsville 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.