Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Illinois

Talbott Hotel Chicago

Chicago, IL · ~91 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Talbott Hotel Chicago runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade B.

Talbott Hotel Chicago: 2.2 TCR = 73% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Talbott Hotel Chicago safety composite

Talbott Hotel Chicago scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2019→2020

Talbott Hotel Chicago injury rate improved

Talbott Hotel Chicago's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.4 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #47/345
  • PHOTO Holiday Inn Express …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holiday Inn Express & Suites (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Talbott Hotel Chicago in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Talbott Hotel Chicago averages 2.2 TCR (73% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Talbott Hotel Chicago TCR series: 2019=4.4 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Talbott Hotel Chicago falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 345 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Illinois.

Talbott Hotel Chicago (91 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Talbott Hotel Chicago
Talbott Hotel Chicago (91 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Talbott Hotel Chicago has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · IL · Chicago

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Express & Suites 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn Fort Lauderdale Cypress Creek 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Villas at Resort World Condo Association Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Express & Suites Jacksonville 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 400253700 DECATUR SD 61 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mason City Area Nursing Home 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campus Communications Group 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1855-AHSCM23 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Carlisle Services LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Physicians Premier Calallen 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Korber Medipak Systems NA, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Harper Facility 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics - Mich 2144 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE RIT Warehouse 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE OEM Tube Assemblies 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.