Carpentry work (except framing) · California

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc

Richmond, CA · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Carpentry work (except framing) workplace, earning a grade D.

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc: 3.6 TCR = 130% of Carpentry work (except framing) BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc safety composite

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.8

2016→2023

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc injury rate improved

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc's TCR fell 11.8 from 15.6 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238350 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 130% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #18/66
  • PHOTO Lycos Finish, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lycos Finish, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc averages 3.6 TCR (130% of the Carpentry work (except framing) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc TCR series: 2016=15.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc falls in its industry

367 Carpentry work (except framing establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 66 Carpentry work (except framing employers in California.

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc (37 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc
Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc (37 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Tamalpais Commercial Cabinetry, Inc has fewer employees than the Carpentry work (except framing) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 15.6 11.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238350 · CA · Richmond

367 Carpentry work (except framing) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lycos Finish, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Door Installation, LP 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RPI INDUSTRIES INC. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overhead Door Company Indianapolis Doors 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Spraying LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN - 01 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Advanced Metal Components 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR A&K Specialty 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jayhawk Mechanical, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Westin Tampa Bay 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vibo Construction Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ttg Electric Co., Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin Distributing Company Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE eTEC Fire Protection 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.