Baseball clubs, professional or semiprofessional · Florida

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts

Tampa, FL · ~383 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
28.9
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts runs at 932% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Baseball clubs, professional or semiprofessional workplace, earning a grade F.

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts: 28.9 TCR = 932% of Baseball clubs, professional or semiprofessional BLS 3.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts safety composite

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 28.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts: 25.4 → 40.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 40.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2024

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts's TCR rose 15.5 from 25.4 in 2016 to 40.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 711211 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 28.9 · 932% of ind

  • DART 14.5 DART
  • RANK #10/12
  • PHOTO Trail Blazers, Inc. …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 691 inj
  • SIZE ~383 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trail Blazers, Inc. Practice Facility (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts averages 28.9 TCR (932% of the Baseball clubs, professional or semiprofessional BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts TCR series: 2016=25.4 · 2017=28 · 2018=23.6 · 2019=33.3 · 2020=22.2 · 2021=26.7 · 2022=22.8 · 2023=37.3 · 2024=40.9 · BLS 3.1

Where Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts falls in its industry

157 Baseball clubs, professional o establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 12 Baseball clubs, professional o employers in Florida.

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts (383 employees, TCR 28.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 206 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts
Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts (383 employees, TCR 28.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 206 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Tampa - GMS, Himes, US Scouts has more employees than the Baseball clubs, professional or semiprof median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 40.9 14.5 93 0 0
2023 37.3 11.7 80 0 0
2022 22.8 10.9 46 0 0
2021 26.7 12.1 75 0 0
2020 22.2 17.0 34 0 0
2019 33.3 10.2 108 0 0
2018 23.6 6.8 82 1 0
2017 28.0 8.9 88 0 0
2016 25.4 6.0 85 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

711211 · FL · Tampa

157 Baseball clubs, professional or semiprofessional employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trail Blazers, Inc. Practice Facility 29.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAJOR ST CAMP DUNEDIN BLUE JAYS MAJOR ST CAMP DUNEDIN BLUE JAYS 29.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panthers Football LLC 29.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BANNER SEVENTEEN, LLC 28.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastern Service Area 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3702 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4260 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1536 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR DAP-US Corp 28.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pennwest California** 28.9 TCR
NAT-TCR WIFT,LLC 28.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage on the Marina 28.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ultra Manufacturing USA dba Mitchell Plastics 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMKokopelli921 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Somerset 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shiel Sexton Company 383 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.