Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · Kansas

Tank Connection Construction Division

Parsons, KS · ~49 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tank Connection Construction Division runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Tank Connection Construction Division: 1.5 TCR = 53% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tank Connection Construction Division safety composite

Tank Connection Construction Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tank Connection Construction Division: 0.0 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 3.42× in 2024

Tank Connection Construction Division's TCR rose 5.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 5.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Parsons, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 53% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Georgia Concrete and…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Georgia Concrete and Precast LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Tank Connection Construction Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tank Connection Construction Division averages 1.5 TCR (53% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tank Connection Construction Division TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=5 · BLS 2.8

Where Tank Connection Construction Division falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Structural steel erecting or i employers in Kansas.

Tank Connection Construction Division (49 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tank Connection Construction Division
Tank Connection Construction Division (49 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Tank Connection Construction Division has fewer employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 3 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · KS · Parsons

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 37 employers in Parsons, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Georgia Concrete and Precast LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ajax Construction Co Inc 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSD Building Corp. 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Decatur County Beef, LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE ULYSSES FEED YARD 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deseret Cattle Feeders 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohlde Dairy 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Labette Health 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR PAR-ODFL 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ruskin Company 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR 368 236 FTE
NAT-TCR Gregory Pallet & Lumber Roanoke 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DAG001 Dept of Agriculture 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Values Into Action Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LUMA Hotel - Times Square 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hoosier Pride Farms, LLC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE C & S Manufacturing Corporation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Machine Products 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freeland Dairy 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.