Used parts, motor vehicle, merchant wholesalers · California

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc.

San Diego, CA · ~95 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. runs at 424% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Used parts, motor vehicle, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc.: 9.3 TCR = 424% of Used parts, motor vehicle, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. safety composite

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc.: 3.4 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 15.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2023

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc.'s TCR rose 3.6 from 3.4 in 2017 to 7.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423140 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 424% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #24/33
  • PHOTO U Pull And Pay Pitts…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: U Pull And Pay Pittsburgh (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. averages 9.3 TCR (424% of the Used parts, motor vehicle, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2019=7 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=14.6 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=7 · BLS 2.2

Where Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. falls in its industry

235 Used parts, motor vehicle, mer establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 33 Used parts, motor vehicle, mer employers in California.

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. (95 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc.
Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. (95 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Tapatio Auto & Truck Wrecking Inc. has more employees than the Used parts, motor vehicle, merchant whol median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.0 6.0 7 0 0
2022 15.6 6.8 14 2 0
2021 14.6 14.6 11 1 0
2020 8.4 7.2 7 0 0
2019 7.0 7.0 6 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423140 · CA · San Diego

235 Used parts, motor vehicle, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR U Pull And Pay Pittsburgh 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1380 LKQ Broadway 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1291 PYP San Bernardino 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1712 LKQ 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Del Llano Farms 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Los Altos Farms, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE TreeSource 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa View Farms 2 (Madera) 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 0579 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1131 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops #277 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Adrian 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Horst Engineering 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rail Logistics, Inc 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100859 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100088 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.