Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Massachusetts

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc

Springfield, MA · ~102 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade D.

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc: 7.0 TCR = 185% of Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc safety composite

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.3

2019→2023

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc injury rate improved

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc's TCR fell 10.3 from 12.9 in 2019 to 2.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=12.9 · 2020=5.6 · 2023=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Springfield, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 185% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #48/60
  • PHOTO NAPC Lawrenceville
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NAPC Lawrenceville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tapestry Health Systems, Inc averages 7.0 TCR (185% of the Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc TCR series: 2019=12.9 · 2020=5.6 · 2023=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Tapestry Health Systems, Inc falls in its industry

2,836 Dermatologists' offices (e.g., establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 60 Dermatologists' offices (e.g., employers in Massachusetts.

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc (102 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tapestry Health Systems, Inc
Tapestry Health Systems, Inc (102 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Tapestry Health Systems, Inc has more employees than the Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2020 5.6 5.6 4 0 0
2019 12.9 12.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MA · Springfield

2,836 Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 215 employers in Springfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NAPC Lawrenceville 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Station Medical 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 504 Hicksville Road 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UHA WVU Medical Corp, d.b.a University Health Associates main campus 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE DEME Offshore US 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quincy Office 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Distributors 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seaman Paper Company Paper Mill 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMC - Baystate Medical Center 8,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMP - Baystate Medical Practices 1,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Tarp Redevelopment, LLC d/b/a MGM Springfield 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMF - Baystate Medical Practices 1,746 FTE
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100593 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0746 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vintage Hills of Indianola 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Patrick's Signs Meade 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Insulation Systems, Inc 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Power Transformer Corp 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE PROSOCO 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX.AUSTI.135 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.