Low voltage electrical work · Alabama

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc.

Cottondale, AL · ~51 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. safety composite

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Cottondale, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/44
  • PHOTO BE Decatur
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BE Decatur (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Low voltage electrical work establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 44 Low voltage electrical work employers in Alabama.

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. (51 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. (51 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Taylor Electrical Contractors, Inc. has fewer employees than the Low voltage electrical work median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · AL · Cottondale

4,550 Low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 11 employers in Cottondale, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BE Decatur 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aldridge Electric 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Electric LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INC. - WA OPERATIONS 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE M&M Calvert 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fossil Generation Gadsden Steam Plant 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 409 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE AFS Mobile 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAC Cottondale 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inteva Products Cottondale Operations 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Corporation - Tuscaloosa 2 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR 016 TA Tuscaloosa 91 FTE
NAT-TCR BE Decatur 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Medic 94 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Instrumentation Laboratory 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Frontier Management, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE LANDAU 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE CrossGlobe 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birdsboro 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Plumbing Heating and Air Conditioning 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.